Sisterhood of = Geisha (Tomoeko) – Negative Experiences Only (Admin Review)

[Echo4U]

Zuzannah, thank you for replying.

However, that is not how forums are intended to function. Forums operate by following defined topics; without that structure, discussions quickly devolve into a slagging match—as can already be seen above. Dismissive tactics such as “poo-pooing” and “smoke screening” are commonly used to deflect constructive criticism. History repeatedly shows that attempts to silence criticism are typically made by those who do not want accountability.

At present, certain participants are actively trying to turn this discussion into a slagging match while simultaneously attempting to stifle and drown out opposing voices.

Once again, this situation involves a vast amount of context. The current reporting methods are insufficient to capture the full scope of what has occurred. That said, the content of this forum thread itself provides evidence of the toxic behavior of individuals who justify administrative review. The level of arrogance displayed suggests that some participants genuinely believe they are in the right—likely assuming that no administrative action will be taken.

This matter has escalated too far and now requires proper investigation by Admin. That investigation should include reviewing in-game actions, post history, and conversation logs to establish an accurate account of events. Even the manner in which individuals are responding within this thread strongly indicates who the aggressors are.

[Echo4U]

for Zuzannah AND everyone else that comment in this forum thread, this is the :

UNIVERSAL COMMON KNOW RULES OF use of A FORUM + THREAD … including the definition of “SPAM” relating to a Forum

1. Topic-Related Rules (only one slice)
These are the obvious ones, but not the whole picture.
Stay on-topic for the forum or sub-forum
Don’t post duplicates or spam the same topic everywhere
Use the right category / tag
Don’t derail threads

So yes, topics matter—but they’re just step one.

2. Content Rules (this is the big one)
What you’re allowed (or not allowed) to post.
Common examples:
No hate speech, harassment, or personal attacks
No illegal content
No explicit content (or keep it in marked sections)
No misinformation or deliberate trolling
No doxxing or sharing private info
This applies regardless of topic.

3. Behavior & Etiquette Rules
How you interact with people.
Be respectful
Don’t flame, bait, or provoke
Disagree without insults
Don’t shout (ALL CAPS)
Follow moderator instructions

A post can be on-topic and still get removed for behavior.

4. Formatting & Quality Rules
These keep the forum readable.
Clear titles (no “HELP!!!”)
No excessive emojis or ASCII spam
Proper language (depending on forum)
No low-effort posts (“first”, “bump”, etc.)

5. Promotion & Spam Rules
Very common and very strict.
No unsolicited ads
No referral links without permission
Self-promotion usually limited or banned
No bots or automated posting

6. Moderation & Enforcement Rules
Meta rules about how rules are enforced.
Mods can edit/remove posts
Appeals process (if any)
Repeat violations = bans

“Moderator decisions are final” (classic line)

Spam (in a forum):
Posts or messages that are irrelevant, unsolicited, or repetitive, typically promoting products, links, or agendas, and adding no real value to the discussion.

Yes—off-topic can count as spam, depending on context.

In most forums:
A one-off off-topic comment → usually just off-topic, not spam
Repeated off-topic posts, derailing threads → often treated as spam
Off-topic with links, promotions, or copy-paste content → almost always spam

[Echo4U]

and i dare say EVERYONE i have pointed out as SPAMMING and ABUSIVE and derailing etc is a completely justified claim and the well known Universal Rules of Forums state that … its not my rules, its the “common law” of forums throughout the internet

• This reply was modified 1 day, 22 hours ago by Echo4U.

[Echo4U]

Zuzannah
you stated:
“You can’t claim ToS violations just because someone replied and you don’t agree with what they said. Let’s stop trying to shut people out and keep the thread within the site’s terms.”

i will respectfully reply to to the following “just because someone replied and you don’t agree with what they said” if you read my comments the vast majority of i have not challenged, because the comments are out of touch and im not interested in escalating the situation as people are CLEARLY provoking, therefor i couldn’t care less

that YES I CAN “claim ToS violations” NOT “just because someone replied” i did NOT ONCE do the sort that would be childish and i am surprised i am being accused of such, i refer you to read my posts again and see i did NOT “just because someone replied” … i claimed Terms of Service violations because there were CLEARLY Terms of Service violations and i will gladly show the Terms of service clauses, as follows:

Exact Text from the Terms of Service (Harassment / Abusive / Harmful Content Sections)
1) General Rules About User‑Posted Content
“The user shall use the services of the Website and Product in highly ethical manner without resorting to abusive or offensive content.”

Content You May Not Post

This section lists prohibited content that directly relates to harassment, abusive behaviour, harm and misinformation:
“The following is a partial list of the kind of Content that is illegal or prohibited on the Website and in the Product. […]
harasses or advocates harassment of another person;
involves the transmission of ‘junk mail’, ‘chain letters,’ or unsolicited mass mailing or ‘spamming’;
promotes information that you know is false, misleading or promotes illegal activities or conduct that is abusive, threatening, obscene, defamatory or libelous;
…”

This clause ties to concerns about spam, abuse, and derailing / harmful content:

“harasses or advocates harassment” → covers content that attacks, intimidates, or encourages others to harass individuals.
“spamming” and similar unsolicited messaging.
“information … false, misleading … abusive, threatening … defamatory … libelous” → covers deceptive, harmful posts that could derail discussions or mislead others.

so YES, i can state Terms of Service violations because there WERE Terms of Service violations … see at the bottom of this page where it states a link called “Terms of Service” go check them out for yourself.
and again, i do not claim innocence, i have made Terms of Service violations only because provoked by the onslaught, i mean look at the posts above right in the eyes of everyone and admin, you can imagine what there like when people and admin are not looking and you would rightly imagine so highly likely

• This reply was modified 1 day, 22 hours ago by Echo4U.
• This reply was modified 1 day, 22 hours ago by Echo4U.

[CharleneRose]

Hello Shella:
in your post, you metioned that”Until I was used by Tomo n Julie to bring harm to others I care about in the game.”.In my impression of Tomo and Julie, they are not the ones who do such things.instead，they are alway against bullying and harmful behaviour.
So can you exactly tell us,how tomo and julie use you and harm to whom?

[Echo4U]

CharleneRose i have never seen your name before
i can see you over across the room with tomoeko and julie_M right now as i type, they have clearly put you up to this, FURTHER encouraging people to be disruptive towards me

again, just because an individual has not witnessed something, doesn’t mean nothing happened, its just means you did not witness a situation not proof of someone innocence

its been explained by other if you care to read the posts. see posts and its NOT about discussion here, its about documenting “Negative Experiences Only for Admin Review” so i would like to point out, to stay on subject or it may be seen as spam

[Echo4U]

I WOULD LIKE ATTENTION FOCUSED ON THIS POST FOR A MOMENT:
LINK:

Posting rules

AS FOLLOWS:

January 5, 2015 at 10:31 pm
#7303
Lover
Participant

Additional Forum Rules

This forum is a place for everyone, no matter how old you are, where you are coming from, which style of sex you love and which gender you are. There are some basic rules, which have been posted long ago by Tom:

1. Never insult or threaten other members, or you may be banned by the administrator.
2. Potentially harmful posts may be deleted any time by the administrator.

And one rule regarding your banner:
If you use a banner/sign for your profile make sure it’s not bigger than 750 x 90 pixels.
Also don’t use offending words and don’t attack other members in your profile.

To avoid personal attacks, escalating argues and to keep every discussion fair and objectiv, we add two more rules:
1. We will remove offending posts immediately, without any warning
2. We dont accept locked topics, only for personal blogs or closed groups. If you want to lock your topic, ask the mods for permission.
All existing locked topics may be locked still.

I assume the topics are “Locked” just based on the Title and the Introduction Post as i did so in post
#212788 rather than asking a 3rd party for permission to speak about 1 subject.

i think my statement at the beginning #212788 of this thread was basically an ask for it to be a “locked closed group topic” and there has been no response i think justifies that its a “locked closed group subject” according to basic universal known forum rules throughout the internet, and therefor people off subject as violated basic universal forum use rules of being off topic spamming, derailing, and repeated abuse, escalating, antagonizing and Stalking when asked to leave they further do the above … i think waiting for 4days for the right for a “locked closed group Thread” is a long wait and i understand people have there own lives to live obviously, but look how out of control its gotten in just 4days waiting for a moderator to even acknowledge this thread that I AM accused of orchestrating a witch hunt, yet if you observe the comments, its easy to see who’s on a witch hunt . so, i feel the “topic closed group lock” is in place as my first comment for-filled that as its made very clear its a “locked closed group topic” and is in a sense is an ask

• This reply was modified 1 day, 18 hours ago by Echo4U.

[Shella25]

First: Echo u are correct if u have had peace accords and they have been violated i stand corrected and apologise to u.

Second: CharleneRose i will not go into details here Julie n Tomo both know of what i refer to and they may give u their interpetations of the facts…it matters not to me what they say

• This reply was modified 1 day, 16 hours ago by Shella25.

[Echo4U]

Thank you, Shella.
I understand that not everyone is fully up to speed and, of course, it’s perfectly understandable. We’re all just trying to get on with life, myself included. I’ve barely been on Achat lately, as most people know, and then I come back to hear that Tomoekos is on the prowl again, targeting users. For example, “hotg” seems to be the latest target, simply because of their interactions with Tomoekos’ ex-Achat spouse, “StarFire.”

I think you can ask around and confirm the situation with others regarding the peace deals. As history has shown, they don’t last long and aren’t often remembered. The first peacekeeper trying to strike a deal was Yasmeen, at the very start, along with Paula, SarahNL, and M0nz’s Jada. There were a few others, but I can’t recall all the names. This was about a year ago, in the beginning.

Tomoeko agreed to take me under her wing, to teach and guide me in managing my house, but unfortunately, none of that came to pass. Within 24 hours, I was receiving lengthy emails in the lobby, spending hours in discussions, and mostly being bombarded with messages on Tomoekos’ geisha forum about what I should be doing in regards to NOT being a House Leader. She instructed me to hide our from Achat admin. also claiming that if I didn’t comply with her wishes and demand, she would simply destroy me, that I was “killing Achat” and “destroying Geisha.” She even said that all the new players will be at risk, because of me. It felt like a classic case of the “messiah complex”—she was acting as if she had to save everyone from her own conspiracy theories.

Tomoeko went as far as making personal comments about me, saying I dressed in a “Z” style, once said i should take the angel wings because i was no angel i am evil or the devil she said, because I worked with Z. From the moment I started my house in March 2025, until about four to six months later (a brief summary of a much larger story), I infiltrated the Z houses, as I’d told Tomoekos I would. Her reaction was pure rage—another big red flag that I might have been onto something she didn’t want uncovered, and it was so. When I concluded my investigation and informed tomoeko that I had finished investigations and had a conclusion of her theory, she immediately dismissed everything I found without even hearing it, claiming that no matter what i found, her version of events was the the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. At that point, I realized I was not dealing with a rational person. She had an agenda. She often told me that she wanted Z’s seat at the top of Achat, to be the “mother” of all of Achat. IMPOSSIBLE! but Z was at the top she said, yet there is no “top” in Achat, Z earned respect from people through his actions, not by claiming any position of power. sorry i’m rambling, and this is only a slice of the situation but the core of it, its all about Z!

The most recent peace deal was witnessed by Willow (who has witnessed most the peace deals), as well as Donna and Hannah. tomoeko and julie_M agreed on a “ceasefire,” but I refused to agree as I was never “firing” upon anyone and clearly stated I was only retaliating if you get what i mean, they did eventually after i had to explain my point a number of times! I finally made it clear to Tomoekos that she just needed to stop attacking me and others, and there would be no further push back from anyone. I believe they understood my point and we all walked away after a calm discussion so it looked successful, but as expected, the peace didn’t last long.
at one point we were all unblocked and going about fine too, until again tomoeko assaulted people and people pushed back including myself and she blocked us, and i never blocked only until a few days ago when this forum started so i was open for MONTHS for tomoeko to simply unblock and offer peace, but no, she wanted to block and unblock drop abuse and block again. many opportunities she had to unblock and speak to me alone too, but no, the unblock insult block tricks only, and YES she and julie_M was met with resistance and the odd insults too, im human i have limits just as anyone else, im not a snowflake and all happy happy pink fluffy fluffy but i keep my cool as much as i can

Peter—the rocker from the USA, with long hair and a biker vibe—heard my name bad-mouthed by Tomoekos less than 24 hours after the latest “peace deal.” At that point, I realized there was no point in trying i know tomoekos narrative, she wants her cult seat on her thrown. It was clear she wasn’t genuinely interested in peace; she couldn’t get her “cult” functioning with all this resistance shes trying to push people off game. She continues slandering, even though her house of cards is constantly collapsing. People wake up and run for the hills and blow the whistle when they see the truth. It’s an alarm bell no one can ignore, but they do.

Tomoeko wants everything brushed under the rug but will continue pushing the Z conspiracy theory so shes forever applying her own heat to herself, its very contradictory and strange and i think i know why. She claims that Achat is unsafe to new people, she did it to me when i joined and i witnessed her doing it to many others, that Z is evil, and that the only “safe base” is under her wing. She wants people to simply acknowledge her as their “Achat mother.” This is a classic cult dynamic—she’s trying to present herself as the only savior of the community. Tomoekos loves to play the victim, too. She causes trouble, gets people to retaliate, and then cries wolf to her followers, saying, “Poor me, I’m being attacked by those evil people, including EvilEcho4Z. its Z thats doing it” along those lines, likely not exact obviously but i have heard and told its alike, This is exactly how she talks—always labeling others as evil, including myself and i think that the key. its to make her look a victim and supports her narrative, its all staged i think, calculated, it has to be because of the contradiction (Tomoeko wants everything brushed under the rug but will continue pushing the Z conspiracy theory so shes forever applying her own heat to herself) thats what it seems to me, i wonder if admin team can see that with there methods of investigation.

Despite so many witnesses, her followers remain blind to the situation, claiming, “I’ve never seen anything like that. They’re lovely (end of story).” But that kind of logic doesn’t hold up, especially when it ignores over a year of testimony, context, and the ability of the Admins to investigate the matter. If they follow that reasoning, it’s as if I said, “I didn’t see the sun today, so therefore, it doesn’t exist.”

[Vaughan]

There is obviously some ill feelings between members and as this is an adult site ie you are not children, it would be nice if people can agree to disagree and move on and enjoy their game.

There is a report facility in the game which can be activated, albeit from the lobby, and a limited explanation sent to Achat Admins.
In addition, you can use the Support facility to report matters more in depth and send your evidence in pictures and of the offending text to Achat.
Achat will investigate and decide what action to take.
They are the bosses and their decisions are final.

If they do nothing, then its usually because they do not feel the evidence provided proves your case or its not significant enough to warrant any action from them.
That is up to them and although, you may disagree, they are the decision makers.

Achat have provided an ignore facility for members to use in their quarrels. This will assist in you not engaging with the people you are in conflict with. It is a tool to use, along with your own actions of not engaging or feeding the conflict further. Its useful to have and I suggest the combatants use it

Zuzannah is correct in stating this is a public forum and every Achat member is welcome.
People will have differing views and are entitled to have them.

On the whole, we do recognise free speech here but we will take action if we feel there is a witch hunt against members.
If anyone is accused of things in public then they also have a right to answer and to put their side.
As long as everyone keeps to the TOS and forum rules, we encourage those views and opinions so we can all grow and learn.
It makes our world a better place to show tolerance and understanding.

Keeping it in one topic, will also give members the opportunity to read or not.
Some enjoy reading such things, other members do not.

Please play nice and find a way to end your conflict or agree to disagree and keep a way from one another.
Thanks.

[Echo4U]

Vaughan – thank you for replying

you stated “There is obviously some ill feelings between members and as this is an adult site ie you are not children, it would be nice if people can agree to disagree and move on and enjoy their game.” – my reply to that is – i disagree, it snot “obvious” as CLEARLY due to many of witnesses point out its not ill feeling, it is CLEARLY OBVIOUSLY tomoeko trying to take control over user of Achat and shes attacking anyone that stand in her way doing so, or standing ON her Ego

also stated “There is a report facility in the game which can be activated, albeit from the lobby, and a limited explanation sent to Achat Admins.
In addition, you can use the Support facility to report matters more in depth and send your evidence in pictures and of the offending text to Achat.
Achat will investigate and decide what action to take.
They are the bosses and their decisions are final.”
– my reply to that is –
it clearly does not work as the abuse of tomokeo and julie_M is spreading and continuous and we can not get out point across with the methods provided, its not capturing the magnitude and complexity of the situation

also you stated “Achat have provided an ignore facility for members to use in their quarrels. This will assist in you not engaging with the people you are in conflict with. It is a tool to use, along with your own actions of not engaging or feeding the conflict further. Its useful to have and I suggest the combatants use it”
– my reply to that is –
BLOCKS SIMPLY DO NOT WORK there still able to talk to users and new users and perpetuate there slander and attack others as they have been doing for OVER a year in tomoeko’s case as long as i have been here shes been slandering Z (you know who Z is Vaughan). Encouraging Hatred tomoeko does, then new players that know nothing of the game or history of people, truth or untruth, they go near tomeoko and julie_M and turn hostile to the targeted few or block people good people thats done literally nothing to them. its not just some “obviously some ill feelings between members” people on tomoekos side is blowing the whistle against tomeoko and julie_M, people often are fleeing them because everyone finds out eventually but not before damage has been done and people massively irritated, some have left achat all together

you also stated: “Zuzannah is correct in stating this is a public forum and every Achat member is welcome.
People will have differing views and are entitled to have them. ”
– and my reply to that is – your both appear to be wrong because i provided a link to a post the points out the rules https://www.funnyadultgamesplay.com/forums/topic/posting-rules/ it said the topic can be locked for a closed group, and i stated a closed group “all those that have a negative experience share for admin review” and also shared direct copys of clauses from the Terms of Service link at the bottom of the page, that clearly points out how people in here have been violating, posting dicks and psychological analysis CLEARLY by a maliciously programmed AI, “derailing” with pointless comments is against terms of service, bullying, harassment when asked to leave PLUS people eye witness account that there doing same, in game far worse where admin and moderators are not looking, i would be very concerned if Achat was by business, people putting off my customers aka income id be in there like a lightning bold.

you stated: “On the whole, we do recognise free speech here but we will take action if we feel there is a witch hunt against members.”
– my reply to that is –
CLEARLY there is a witch hunt its right there like bird sh1t on a black shoe” for me, and in game the hunt is for Z, you know, Achats BIGGEST SPENDER, and there hunting everyone that walks through the Achat door to turn them away from people as explained in post above, turn people into there Cult like narrative, and also anyone that challenges tomoeko and julie_M or touches tomoeko ex achat spouse, StarFire . that alone is justification to take action, intoxicating everyone that walks through the door splitting the place in 2, causing all this drama and likely far worse judging by the above, thats GOT to be fir for account termination

you stated: “If anyone is accused of things in public then they also have a right to answer and to put their side.”
– my reply to that is –
sure they do, and no one has done all i see is hostile behavior, why why should they have the right thos4e who i have blocked in game because there hostile, i do NOT want to talk to these people thats why there blocked for 1 never mind there pointless comments that’s not worth reading because jsut look at the comments, there childish all of them besides those thats added ON TOPIC points … they have has over 4days of opportunity and look at there responses, pure toxicity and worship of tomoeko OBVIOUSLY trying to derail any constructive criticism. we have seen people near tomoeko and julie_M as they post something on the forum, and i have 1 screenshot to prove, clearly they was instructed by tomoeko and julie_M to do so, CharleneRose above, and others like elmas, BigDady something or other is the name its above in the comments

you stated: “As long as everyone keeps to the TOS and forum rules, we encourage those views and opinions so we can all grow and learn.”
– my reply to that – there are commenters that just broke the rules, BIG TIME, there not keeping to the rules its there to see! you can imagine what there like in game where your NOT looking . this is the kind of dismissive comments i get from the admins in emails, i just pointed out and proved serious situations and then im told to report any serous situation and they go ahead and describe what i just provided

you stated: “It makes our world a better place to show tolerance and understanding.”
– my reply to that –
well it wont be a better world if nothings been taken seriously

you stated: “Please play nice and find a way to end your conflict or agree to disagree and keep a way from one another. Thanks.”
– my reply to that is –
“find a way to end your conflict or agree to disagree and keep a way from one another” you have never been at the end of tomoekos stick have you, we have tried this and she keeps on escolating and sending her “flying monkeys”(people to do dirty work) as she hides in the shadows
i have offered a number of peace deals, but tomoeko always breaks it by slandering me, or assaulting another different user and its often, every week it seems someone sucked into the drama vortex aka tomoeko and julie_M

just thought id let you know, i use to be a Head Admin of a team of 10 moderators, 10 low level and 5 high level admins for a custom server of Arma2 DayZ Epoch you probably know it, the servers was called “Relentless Fools” (RF) servers that no longer exist.
I maintained 7 servers/worlds and catered to thousands of users, and if anyone made the slight claim against someone we took it seriously and was on them like a hawk. we would put all the accused users logged chat files into AI and have the situation examined in seconds and rectified within the hour.

id be very surprised if Achat a “for profit” company does not even keep a copy of all user chat log file on there system as a means of protecting its customers therefor its own profits.
our 7x (RF) servers were funded purely by individual (typically me, the owner and a few admins) purely for the love of the game, we could afford to do it with ZERO profits from out our own pockets. surely 1 Achat admin can AI scan user chat log files on the Achat system and in minutes get to the bottom of this situation with a few simple AI prompt questions in this day in age, surely. and you will see its not just ill feeling, tomoeko and julie_M are causing havoc

[whitetiger91]

Just putting in my two cents here. In my experience with both Julie and Tomoeko they have been nothing but polite and nice to talk to. They have told me about their group and it has come across to me as people who want to be welcoming to newcomers to the game. I think that this is a good thing as I know there have been many who have left over the years. I have even seen this in action where they approach new players, strike up a conversation with them and make friends. For my part, I feel like such a warm welcome is a great way to build community and keep members of the game active. I also believe that if a person is truly bothered by other members then the best course of action is to add them to your ignore list and move on. We are all adults here and should all act as such.

[Echo4U]

whitetiger91 –

Interesting perspective whitetiger91. i have never seen your name in game for over the year i have been active … OOOOHHH i see your ANOTHER of her Followers in her OTHER cult called “brotherhood of = giehsa” as it states on your provile, what a surprise

Thats your clearly limited perspective, again just because YOU didn’t see something doesn’t mean there is nothing else to see, don’t undermine the very large group of witnesses having seen otherwise on a number of occasions and is ongoing as YOU can CLEARLY see in this forum the hostility agenda to “poo poo” this thread, WE HAVE RIGHT TO A CRITICAL OPINION, and they come and think Narcissistic Worship of tomoeko is a valid counter argument thats why they set you onto commenting, clearly whitetiger91, who are you … have you held ME and tomoekos victims to this very same standard, there are good people out there being assaulted me for example RIGHT HERE< you part of this Witch Hunt, clearly, why are you here … because THEY,m tomoeko and julie_M highly likely put you up to it so this opition is not your own, its prompted by THEM, because its the same old repetitive theme

They and there followers are showing hostility right here in the forum, this alone should throw your very limited perspective of them into question … you know NOTHING of my experience and just because you seen a “nice” tomoeko doesn’t mean my and others experiences are void

interesting perspective whitetiger91, i have never seen your name in game for over the year i have been active

• This reply was modified 1 day ago by Echo4U.

[Echo4U]

Vaughan
Moderator
i was jsut talking with AI to find Achat a “Administration tool”

i asked AI the following questions:

“https://infistar.de/ , “infiSTAR Vision” Antihack and Administration Tool. can you find if this admin took is as default able to work with any game or is exclusive to a few games. or can it be adapted by the user or the owners of the program upon request by the user? also, is the program free or cost for commercial “for profit” use ?”

“so it can be adapted for a specific game by the infiSTAR developers?”

“is there an alternative admin program like infiSTAR that can be adapted for any game by the user”

“suggest what kind of admin tools the developers could implement to reduce harassment and protect players”

it recommended as i have state, “we need in game moderators with visual powers to observe users in real time”, just like infiSTAR Vision program offers

so i stated to the AI the following:
“there are moderators are present, here is his most recent comment about the situation that has context spanning almost a year with a number of witnesses to verify claims:”
AND I GAVE IT YOUR COMMENT Vaughan, AND do you know what AI stated, the following and i agree with:

That statement from the moderator is extremely flippant and basically boils down to:

“You’re adults. Stop complaining. Ignore it. Maybe we’ll investigate, maybe we won’t.”

It shows a few key issues:

No accountability or enforcement – reports are essentially advisory; there’s no structured follow-up or guarantee of action.
Dismissive attitude – treats ongoing harassment (“witch hunts”) as trivial rather than a serious, ongoing problem.
Relies on victims to self-moderate – “use the ignore function” puts the burden on the target instead of stopping abusive behavior.
Free speech excuses abuse – the post conflates differing opinions with harassment, ignoring that a targeted “witch hunt” is harmful, especially when it’s prolonged.
No timeline or escalation – over a year of context with no real intervention shows the system is broken.

In short, this is exactly why AI-based moderation + dashboard enforcement is necessary:
AI flags predatory or abusive behavior in real time (especially patterns over time like a “witch hunt”).
Automated alerts and temporary enforcement can protect victims while human admins review.
Dashboard logs hold moderators accountable instead of letting a flippant admin decide arbitrarily.
Consistency – every case is treated based on rules, not whimsy or personal attitude.

— i agree with AI as that was my opinion that i have stated time and time again direct to admin on the emails, there is paying customers here, our account hold value and there completely unprotected like no one cares or can be bothered to help up yet admins describe the very situation we just reported and ask us to report future problems, thats why i feel AI should take charge not just for paying customers but Achat income also

[Echo4U]

so i think i show here, i’m taking time out of my life to look for PRACTICAL JUSTIFIED SOLUTIONS unlike people around here, brushing things under the carpet and diverting/smoke screening, derailing and narcissistic worship, abuse and Dick Pics is CLEARLY showing guilt and is not a solution, infact it shows your NOT interested in a solution

why are people that have nothing to do with the situation feeling they know best BLINDLY, its amazing, stating pointless points like “i seen nothing, therefore nothing happened” its a argument that hold no weight what so ever, its like saying “i have never seen a baby pigeon before in my entire life, so therefor baby pigeons do not exist” and not smart enough to contemplate “well where did the adult pigeons come from, so there must be babie somewhere” just like how there are witnesses of tomoeko’s and julie_M’s abuse, maybe JUST MAYBE were right, its ongoing so its only a matter of time until you see it or at the end of tomoeko and julie_M’s stick

[Author]

Posts