Forum Replies Created
-
@ Denisee ~ Well, I gotta find the right gif to express my current state of mind. Duh. :
Incorrect Mari'. It's me strutting in with misguided cockiness.
Next to post is Mari'. :-*
@ Martin ~ Hey, close enough. He got his boombox didn't he?
Tango ~ He's forever young.
Bah. I should've known better then to dip my foot inside religiously tainted waters. Never a good idea.
As a friend I admit my folly. I should've reviewed your posts a little more carefully, instead of skimming over them and relying on other posts to provide me with the narrative. Apologies again, and hugs.
Also, speaking for myself I'm always cool. Joe cool.
Nice ones. The black tape does it for me. 😮
Very enticing. Nice find Mari'.
A little contribution from me.
I was informed that I may have been wrong in my assumption that Cheya was of Asian descent. Whoops! If this turns out to be correct, I'll have to make some new banners for her. Just gotta wait on her for a reply back. In the meantime here are the banners anyway. First ones are just slight variants of one another.
@ Denisee ~ Gee wiz, thanks.
*Does respectful bow for Mari* Correct.
Next to post is Bear. I know he'll return one day.
*smells the air*
I like the smell of religious topics in the morning.
If the person in question is promoting God in a way that is blatantly meant to be taken as an insult and offend people of a certain religion, then yes I would agree with Vaelene that what she's doing is in poor taste. If the person is heartfelt about her beliefs and is merely shoving them down your throats then you're entitled to your opinion, that she chose the wrong, inappropriate venue to promote said beliefs. (of course, you can even make an argument to support her methods if you really wanted.) The former case warrants some sort of action. Maybe. (depends on the severity of the insults)
The later I would say doesn't. Maybe it seems misguided. Zealous. Annoying. But like Nexe said, you can just ignore them. I agree with you Vaelene that not everything should be categorized as a 'unique fantasy'' that must be respected and left alone. However, just to play devils advocate, people have depictions of Angels, next to naked character images performing 'sexually enticing' animations. There are some who view Angels as holy religiously imbued figures and would likely be horribly offended to see such divine images be associated with sexually perverse material. Still, you see em' anyway. It's become accepted. Just all depends on your views and how you argue them.P.S Up your nose with a rubber hose
Had to provide an image.
Yea, I know. Was Chris Christie in anyway involved in the GW bridge scandal? Same thing I'm thinking.
Next to post doesn't know what I'm talking about.
lol, I felt I should give back to society, somehow. What better way then by having a real life sized replica of my penis? :